Does Substack have a Nazi problem? This concern, raised by journalist Jonathan Katz in an article in The Atlantic, accuses this platform of allowing white supremacists to spew their ideas, find and harbor community, and raise money.
I don’t want Nazis on Substack. I don’t want Nazis anywhere. But I’m also becoming a free speech absolutist, worried less about a handful of gross white supremacists and more about the implications of what happens when we police speech.
Because: what happens when a critical mass of people changes who they decide the Nazis are?
We are already seeing this, of course. I spent the last week picking fights with anti-Israel Substackers just to see where their logic would and could take them. The results were alarming.
It started when a Substack newsletter by an Australian named Caitlin Johnstone appeared in my feed. Johnstone’s writings are “geared toward awakening human consciousness and drawing humanity into my understanding of what a healthy world would look like.”
Sounds interesting. Then it gets a little weird:
I see illusions as the only obstacle to the creation of a healthy world, which in my view would look like a movement from the competition-based models of capitalism, militarism, imperialism and domination to collaboration-based models where all humans work in cooperation with each other and with our ecosystem toward the common good of all beings. The only things preventing that movement are the large-scale illusions that our rulers have been indoctrinating us with since birth about what’s real and what’s possible, as well as the small-scale illusions of ego and separation which keep us enslaved to fear, greed, and unconscious reactivity.
I added the italics because you can always smell a conspiracy theory when you hear about vague “rulers” and “they” making plans to control the masses.
Since October 7th, Johnstone has been writing constantly and obsessively about Israel. The newsletter that caught my eye is titled “Israel Supporters Would Defend Literally Any Israeli Atrocity,” in which she writes “Israel supporters will defend any evil — literally any evil — as long as it is being perpetrated by their favorite regime. There are zero constraints of any kind, because Israel supporters are completely uninterested in morality.”
In a recent post she declares (sorry for the expletive):
I don’t give a fuck if you’re Jewish. I don’t care what religion you are. If you’re murdering thousands of children, the very least significant thing about that situation is what religion you happen to be. I think the overwhelming majority of people on my side see it this way.
❖
Actually what fuels antisemitism is murdering children by the thousands under the banner of the Star of David while adamantly insisting that your actions are inseparable from all Jews and the totality of Judaism.
Responses to her posts look like this:
You are “antisemitic” if you complain about genocide carried out by those who claim they are chosen people to rule over us all: the zionists who are cloaked in American Exceptionalism and Israeli exceptionalism.
It totally makes sense: how dare you oppose god’s will, which according to the zionists is for 1% of the world to lord over a massive state of global apartheid - and for the other 99% to be serfs and slaves serving the the chosen ones.
Remind me again who the Nazis are?
In interacting with some of these types, I found some patterns.
There is the “Zionists are not Jews” and “Zionism has nothing to do with Judaism” crowd, who will go to great lengths to ignore history and come up with fantastical alternative political solutions. There are the “no ethno-state” people, who might be the most genuine but who live inside a John Lennon song. There are the straight-up Hamas supporters, those who think it’s a legitimate resistance movement. There are the deniers, who will sow doubt around the most atrocious evidence. There are those who creep in the swamps of anti-Semitism, which you can tell because they will let slip some esoteric and negative reference to the Talmud that they picked up in some dark corner of the internet. By extension, there are the people who come right out with their conspiracy theories about Jews trying to run the world. And then there are the simple ones, the ones who do not know how to ask, who have nothing better to say than to call you a liar, sometimes punctuated with a few f-words or an emoji.
Now might be a good time to mention that Caitlin Johnstone’s newsletter has more than 38,000 subscribers.
People like Jonathan Katz are not writing articles in The Atlantic complaining about the problem of people like Caitlin Johnstone getting platformed on Substack, building community, and making money (Johnstone even has instructions for those who want to pay in crypto). This is an extension of the free-speech double standard that is the hard left’s biggest blind spot, the blind spot that tripped the wire for Claudine Gay’s downward spiral. Nazis = bad. People who say all the same things as Nazis but who aren’t right wing…context. (For another example I find interesting, Katz calls out Substack author Richard Hanania for past racism he has disavowed, while Substack author and “award-winning journalist” Aaron Mate is publicly questioning Israeli rape and massacre testimonies. I won’t share the details but you can follow the sordid conversation here.)
But more than all this, the reason I’m not griping to Substack about white supremacists or Muslim supremacists or anyone-but-the-Jews supremacists or had-too-much-ayahuasca supremacists is because you can see how easily the worst person in any given room according to any given person becomes “a Nazi.” Another recent post of Johnstone’s, a sort of hallucinatory ramble, imagines the world from a Jewish Zionist perspective. It’s called “‘Stop Murdering Thousands Of Children,’ Said The Evil Crazy Nazi.”
It’s not beyond the realm of possibility that people who think “Zionists” are the new Nazis will reach a critical mass and decide that “Zionists,” whoever they are, need to be de-platformed. I don’t see this happening any time soon, truth be told. But I also didn’t see October 7th coming, and all the signs were there.
So I will continue to champion free speech, and I will probably continue to use freedom of speech to pick fights with people who believe in Jewish space lasers, because I also enjoy the right of getting satisfaction from making them mad.
Did you think The Cholent was the only Jewish news source in Greater Seattle?
I’d like to share the writing of my student journalists at Northwest Yeshiva High School, where I work very part time as newspaper adviser and journalism teacher.
Mercer Island Muslim and Jewish leaders work together against hate
This story about Mercer Island’s Muslim mayor and Jewish deputy mayor will give you hope!
Seattle Jewish community answering the call to defend Israel
Seventeen members of Seattle’s Jewish community (currently or with family here) were either called up or already serving in the IDF.
Ben Mizrachi: ‘loyal until the very end’
A touching tribute to a victim from Vancouver, BC, who had worked at Sephardic Adventure Camp.
Opinion: Why schools must publicly condemn Hamas
Taking a position of moral clarity doesn’t have to be controversial.
‘With everything negative, there’s always something positive’
New head of school Rabbi Yehuda Gabay reflects on attending the DC march for Israel.
Thought of the week.
Ouch.
My response: Holocaust education would be successful if Jews had stayed dead. What do you think?
Community Announcements
Check out the Seattle Jewish community calendar.
Candlelighting in Seattle is at 4:14 p.m. The parasha is Shemot.
Become a paid subscriber and leave announcements, shoutouts, and comments!
I have struggled with the limits of free speech since the Nazi march in Skokie. What I find most difficult about the substack and online hate mongers is their ability to not have to respond to their vitriol face to face. In the real court of public opinion. In the past this was a more personal endeavor and you needed your ducks in a row. when you faced those that disagreed. Now it's just say whatever you want and forget facts or reality. Louder you shout, more you are followed by the disaffected. When the concept of free speech/hate speech is opened to the light of day as with the Harvard, Penn and MIT presidents there is clarity and personal responsibility.
And I wish it was only a Substack problem. With digital and social media firmly embedded within our communication tool box, society and individuals have simply weaponized information/misinformation. And as you very accurately point out Michael, in the absence of face to face exchanges the normal social checks and balances against taking the debate too far are negated. Add to that the ability to instantly access viewpoints simply to reinforce our own fears and anxieties, well confirmation bias only catalyzes the pathology. Add a healthy dose of cognitive dissonance (i.e. "Christians for Trump", "Queers for Palestine", "Cows for McDonalds") and it's hard to be optimistic. I do know that as we see levels of anti-Semitism rising to a place I have not experienced in my 62 years, the Seattle Jewish Community will become increasingly unified. There will always be divisive voices at the extremes, but as long as we appropriately marginalize bad actors and take care of each other during crisis, well that gets me to be a little more optimistic. A little. ;)