Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Linda Seltzer's avatar

Part 1(somehow the software isn't displaying the comment correctly)

The superintendent does not have any control over many of the things you wrote about. It would be illegal for the superintendent to be involved.

First of all, local school districts have almost complete legal control over their districts, especially curriculum. There are only specific ways in which OSPI can get involved in the issues in a particular school district.

The OSPI does administer some kinds of academic standards and has a say in the overall graduation requirements. Chris' clear position is wanting to reduce the number of requirements and have more electives and individual choice. He does not have the authority to do that unilaterally.

The superintendent has no say over curriculum. The State PESB and the State Board of Education are involved in that. The Office of the Superintendent sends one board member to the PESB.

What I don't understand is how the RCW directs the superintendent to develop ethnic studies content, but somehow, it is being controlled by the PESB. I don't know the role of the State Board of Education. The two commissions are appointed by the governor.

This is the mess that our education system it is, because it is being run by various groups spread out all over the place, and the superintendent has no control over them.

Chris said in a zoom call that the anti-Israel walkouts are against the rules. This is not allowed to happen during classroom hours. During those hours, students are legally considered to be a "captive audience." However, the only way the superintendent's office can enforce it is that a parent or student or staff member has to make a complaint to his office. The local school boards have all control. The only power the superintendent has under the law is to investigate a complaint and determine whether a rule was violated. It seems to be a high legal bar. I am not sure whether members of the public or organizations have the standing to file a complaint.

Expand full comment
Linda Seltzer's avatar

Part 3 (to get the software to display this properly)

Laws are weak if it depends on people making complaints. Legal experts in the state legislature and Congress would have to comment on that. It's the same thing that happens in fighting discrimination against women in the tech industry. The burden of making a complaint is on the party that experienced the discrimination.

Title VI discrimination complaints can be made at the federal level. But that's not over curriculum issues.

In another zoom call, David Olson talked about having conversations with the various sides and trying to resolve disputes. However, this doesn't have a legal standing of a formal investigation of a complaint.

Also the OSPI doesn't control a school district's budget.

Last night at Maria Cantwell's event, I was able to speak to Chris briefly despite all of all of the loud music in the room that prevented detailed conversations. He is meeting with the Jewish Federation to develop policies for the school year. I think other organizations should try to get involved too.

To me, the environment that allowed the low academic quality academic standards of ethnic studies to develop is occurring because there are no clear lines of who is responsible for what, or the relationship between what is in the various education RCWs and the specific responsibilities of the OSPI, the PESB and the State Board of Education. It is also about the use of outside companies, nonprofits and consultants rather than putting the certificated teachers in charge of what happens in their classrooms and schools. Somehow, WAESN has been able to navigate this murky space of undefined responsibilities and get people to advocate for its curriculum. Our community has failed to understand and navigate that space and to get people on these boards and commissions.

In other words, this seems to be an issue for the Attorney General candidates. The Attorney General's office would have to straighten out who is responsible for what and whether anything isn't being decided in the right place. And then the law is pretty strict about school districts having almost total control over everything, and it isn't easy for a state agency to overrule a school district. It's also a discussion to have with candidates for state legislature.

So perhaps an interview with some expert education lawyers would help.

The bottom line is that people should run for school board and support the best candidates. Some of us wanted to get a candidate elected in the Northshore School District. There was nothing we could do without donors for a mailer and strategy to win. This is nonpartisan and shouldn't be partisan.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts