Discussion about this post

User's avatar
<SchmoozGPT>'s avatar

Wow, Emily. This was some cis-het drek. Way to interview a hater from an alt-right christian and anti-trans website that uses reactionary, pseudo sciences, and not even interview a single trans person. Sites like that are like those Christian "abortion" "crises pregnancy centers" but for trans people. I can see where your bias lies. Also, has anyone else notice Emily's writing swinging to the right? Yikes.

As a Jewish trans woman from Seward Park, I can tell you that in a world that actively hates or looks down upon trans people, where trans people have no/little autonomy, and our bodies are constantly being questioned that the need for confidentiality and safety is of great importance. Kids might not feel safe at home -- I never felt safe in my transphobic, orthodox household, and because of that I attempted suicide for the first time at the age of 7. And just because a kid comes out in private as non-binary or trans, that doesn't mean that they will be medicated or choose to do so. You all give kids too little credit. If only I had the knowledge that kids have (and should have) today, perhaps I would have had a happier childhood that wasn't riddled with dysphoria and depression.

PS Emily, it looks like you've attracted a really nice crowd here @forthekids, who get their news from the GCC, that anti-trans rightwing reactionary. No one is telling masc-lesbians that they are men or vice versa.

Expand full comment
for the kids's avatar

Thank you for this article!

A great place to look at the evidence behind these interventions (it's low and very low quality, meaning it is hard to estimate outcomes, in particular , benefits, if you do medical intervention, with high risk) is a recent investigative report, peer reviewed, by Jennifer Block , "gender dysphoria in young people is rising—and so is professional disagreement" https://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj.p382

And the great investigation by Reuters (youth in transition). Also Klotz in the Atlantic and Helen Lewis in the Atlantic.

And a ton of medical articles. Experts are in disagreement....us medical societies are at odds (!!) with the groups following the evidence reviews.

Basically, being trans identified can be temporary and there's a huge unexplained rise (some say more acceptance is why but the rise is mostly young people! And some who are no longer trans, detransitioners, point to social influence, as do some therapists who treat them) but medical interventions have permanent effects, and studies trying to show benefit are unreliable - too short term (there's a honeymoon period for many), or lose track of people, or measure the wrong thing, or an irrelevant group.

Social transition appears to make gender dysphoria persist, and so is an psychological intervention. Countries following the systematic outcome review findings prioritize psychotherapy, not social transition and us affirmation. The us is in a bubble!

UK Cass review, Segm, genspect, lots of info out there.

Here's another reference: https://genspect.org/to-help-trans-identifying-kids-follow-the-science/

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts