Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Irina's avatar

Not surprising, just outrageous. Seattle showing its true prevalent colours, which have always been there covertly most of the time. Only the progressives truly belong here, everyone else is either excluded or doesn't have a voice, tacitly or not so tacitly. I apologize for this generalization, and I imagine that there are many Seattleites who are not aligned with the radical narrative. It may also be that the exhibit wasn't reopen not necessarily or not only because there was no desire to do so on the part of those who could, nor because those in charge were anti-Jewish (it's nice to be idealistic at times), but because there was fear of the so called "public opinion," which is prevailingly, vociferously radical "progressive."

Expand full comment
Julia Duin's avatar

I've read the article twice and I'm still confused. Who is this 'vendor' who put a stop to it all? Sounds like all parties were willing and then the historical society blinked. A better explanation is owed to all. Of course the Wing Luke Museum should have fired all those employees who protested. Unfortunately, the museum caved, but the historical society should have held out until justice was done. In this case, justice delayed was justice denied. Note to Emily - you really should submit a guest editorial to the Seattle Times about this.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts